Lusso Accessibile

Konstantin Korotkov, Ph.D., Prof.

Introduction

Instrumental studies of crop circles have been conducted for many years. The difficulty of this process is not the subject itself, but an unpredictable time, location, and a short time of its existence. It is commonly accepted that crop circles may be both artificial – man-made and natural A lot of interesting facts may be found in Internet , for example, in www.Wikipediа.com; www.lucypringle.co.uk/photos/2006/аug.shtml
www.crystalinks.com/croptheories.html.

We were able to take measurements inside the fresh crop circle at Windmill Hill, Wiltshire, 23.07.06 together with our colleagues Lucy Pringle, Roger Tаilor and  Konstаntin Pаvlidis.

Protocol of measurements

Measurements were done in two phases:

1. Measuring 5 different sensors with the “5 th Element” Device in the following regime: 30 experimental points for the first sensor with 3 seconds interval, then transition to the next sensor; 30 experimental points for the second sensor with 3 seconds interval, then transition to the next sensor; and so on for all 5 sensors; all in all it was 5 rounds. This way we had 150 experimental points for every sensor taken in 5 sessions with 360 seconds interval. All the process took 450 seconds  x 5 rounds = 2250 seconds or approximately 42 minutes. Sensors were as follows: Antenna sensor;Water sensor;Three earth sensors.

2. Measuring electrophotonic emission from the 10 fingers for 6 people first in the barn and then inside the crop circle.
Experimental data have been processed in the “GDV Scientific Laboratory” program produced by KTI Company, the following parameters have been calculated for the dynamical data: Area, Intensity, Form Coefficient, Entropy; and, for human measurements: Energy Field Area, Diagram and Chakra Energy distribution.

Experimental conditions: temperature 24 0C; sunny; little cloudy, little wind; atmospheric pressure 1014 mBar. Distance between locations at Windmill Hill was about 2000 m.

Experimental Results

1. “5 th Element” data

Initial measurements

Area dynamics for all the sensors demonstrated a calm character with little decrease in the first set of measurements. Same behavior was found for Intensity parameter in initial measurements. Form Coefficient parameter demonstrated little increase in the first set of measurements with a following calm character. Entropy parameter was practically stable.

Crop circle measurements

Both Area and Intensity demonstrated strong increase of parameters during all the measurement process. Form Coefficient parameter demonstrated decrease during all the measurement process. Entropy parameter was practically stable.

Statistical Comparison

Statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) was found between “initial” and “crop circle” data for Area and Intensity. Less significant difference was for the Form Coefficient, and no difference for Entropy.

2. human energy measurements (see pictures)
Statistically significant increase (p < 0.0001) of the Energy Field Area and Diagram parameters for all people in the crop circle area was found. Chakra changes were specific for different people (initial data are shaded on the graphs).

3. Measurements in Albury, 26.07.06 (see pictures)
All three measurements demonstrated very calm, linear dynamics without any particular features.
discussion

Both “5 th Element” data and human measurements demonstrated statistically significant changes in the crop circles area. 5-Element parameters demonstrated strong time dynamics in the process of measurements. These may be part of a much longer cycle of variations. We draw attention to the differing character of the time dynamics shown by different sensors, which indicates that the changes are a property of the environment, and not a device error. Further, during 10 years of experience with the GDV Camera this type of strong increase of parameters has never been seen as an artefact. It is very unlikely to have significant changes of Human Energy parameters in 2.5 hours for all participants without some strong influence.  Measurements were all done in the same small location, and in the same mild weather conditions.

Measurements at three different locations in Albury demonstrated very calm dynamics without any peculiarities.
We may conclude that, in this experiment, the area of the crop circle had a significant influence both on sensor parameters and human psycho-physiological condition.

However, serious doubts about the authenticity of this Windmill Hill crop circle were expressed by those present who had had long experience of crop circles. This arose first from the absence of the dowsing reactions, which have come to be taken to indicate genuine circles. And when, later, the aerial photographs became available, it was very clear from irregularity of its form that it was likely to be the poorly-executed work of human beings. Our results are not intended to add something to this discussion: it was only a single measurement at one location only. These results demonstrate the presence of a strong energy anomaly, but do not tell us whether it was due to the crop circle or to some earth energy not associated with the circle, or else perhaps to unusual environmental conditions. It is evident that the “5 th Element” Sensor is a sensitive tool to study energy anomalies, and a lot of data should be collected before drawing more definite conclusions.